BLOG

Big Need for MPLS-TP?

August, 2014

At the service providers across the globe, the most widespread and native selection is MPLS and not MPLS-TP. The former has broader acceptance, superior interoperability, and operational intimacy for the engineering folks. In Asia, particularly China, MPLS-TP has taken off in a big way. While some industry observers view that part of the world as exceptionally unpredictable and may suggest that “TP” could even be replaced, it seems that at least one of the large Chinese operators has such a critical mass of deployment that such a move is not imaginable. On its face, one would think customers should want to go with MPLS-TP over MPLS because the former is a newer version. Ordinarily, any supplier that would happen to start product development from scratch would definitely be inclined to begin in the “TP” direction. Theoretically, MPLS-TP should be a slam-dunk in a greenfield situation at ...

Read More

Impact of Cisco Systems’ Purchase of Tail-f?

August, 2014

What happens to Tail-f and to all of its customers after the acquisition by Cisco? Do those customers have to find a new partner? Will Cisco keep it open to all vendors and competitors? Does Cisco imbed it and no longer allow access to third parties? Each customer probably had an agreement with Tail-f in case of an acquisition. It may be on a case-by-case basis, but in terms a macro answer, these days, there are not purchases without putting in a clause for M&A. For small suppliers, it can be quite detrimental. For example, regarding a component company that was purchased in 2013, large module and system suppliers, such as Finisar, Juniper, etc., put in a stipulation that if the vendor was acquired, and did not supply the devices at ridiculously low prices, then they can take hold of the IP, and produce them somewhere else. It is a Catch 22 situation. If one refuses to sign such a contra ...

Read More